I used a part (up to 1:54) of the video below recently to review what makes an effective opening when making presentations. The whole class discussion lasted maybe 10/15 mins (this was a review session) but this could easily be extended by having the class discuss the question in pairs then whole class feedback and/or if you played the video up to 6:18 mark.* Indeed for engineering and computer science students one could extend the video up to the 11.05 minute mark.**
The question I asked was : What do you think I like about this opening?
Video: Ang Cui and Michael Costello’s Hacking Cisco Phones talk at the 29th Chaos Communications Congress in Berlin Hamburg
The discussion should hopefully centre around the following:
- the presenter clearly gave topic of talk
- he let the audience know what’s in it for them
- he clearly stated why he is talking about it
- he used humour
I reminded students of the attention vs time curve:
(or primacy/recency memory effects) they had looked at in the earlier part of this presentation course and noted that at the beginning all one needs really is an organised opening to make sure the audience will keep on listening. Though attention evoking techniques such as the humour the presenter in the video used is, of course, a bonus.
Students may also comment on the slides and one would need to fast forward to about the 3 minute mark to clearly show how this presenter used watercolours to make his slides stand out. My students also commented on the dynamism of the presenter.***
When talking about the /what’s in it for me?/ aspect I used the acronym WII-FM and the analogy to the radio the audience is tuned into (after 4 ways to move people from attention to engagement).
Hope you enjoyed this, and would be greatly interested to read about other presentation review ideas.
* this part of the talk again illustrates the presenter using humour to engage his audience which certainly works since he gets the laughs.
** there is computer science lexis here which maybe more useful in a non-presentation focused lesson
*** there is an interesting effect when the first presenter hands over to the second, which is I think due to the second presenter making more umms and errs and having a more monotoned voice as well as being less animated/dynamic. Though he does get better as he goes on but the effect is very noticeable – watch after the 11.05 minute mark.